Bob.... my assumption was that the "olympic money" was to all intents and purposes tv money rather than a gratuitous gesture from the IOC.?
I imagine if a moderator is paying attention, then these posts could get shifted to a separate thread.
(Posts moved to new topic -- JM)Alternatively, as suggested above, I could just shave off what remains.
jjk. You are right in what you say. The IOC receives considerable income from television rights, particularly from NBC in the USA, for all the Olympic coverage of all the sports. This income gets distributed to all the (minor) sports governing bodies, the WCF being one. How does the WCF then spend what it gets from the IOC? It provides money to help countries construct facilities, it helps with buying stones, it runs clinics and courses, it supports curling development officers and implements the Development Assistance Program.
And I believe that the WCF spends some $1.75 million on the WCTV operation, and the priority at first was to cover the European Championships, hence the feed to Eurosport. It's all about developing the sport by increasing awareness via television. Recently there has been coverage of the Worlds, particularly in Korea and Japan. This has received huge audiences in Asia, and of course then there is opportunity for INFRONT to gain increased sponsorship and recoup some of the costs.
I don't pretend to understand all the ins and outs of this, but I think that's the gist.
Bob