Choose fontsize:   H *  L *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
 
Menu
  Global Menu
     Home
     Forum
     Links
     Log In
     Contact SCF
  
  Rink Info
     Curling Availability
     Come & Try Sessions
Members
Total Members: 653
Latest: Replicurl1
Stats
Total Posts: 11291
Total Topics: 618
Online Today: 28
Online Ever: 176
(February 06, 2010, 02:51:31 PM)
Users Online
Users: 3
Guests: 20
Total: 23
Permissions

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Send this topicPrint  
Author Topic: Scottish 2010/11  (Read 5716 times)
Sandy Morton
In Da House
*****
Offline Offline

Curling Club: Millport Cuddling Club
Posts: 1068



« Reply #30 on: May 25, 2010, 08:16:05 PM »

If Bob had raised this issue before Friday would he have got the, very well deserved, award?
As a person committed to Curling he is without equal but he must be unique as an investigative journalist who should maybe have been a lawyer?

I don't know about a boycott but maybe money back before anything happens would be at least as appropriate.

When can we have our game back?
Logged
onthebutton
Global Moderator
Skip
*****
Offline Offline

Curling Club: Cocktail CC
Posts: 304



WWW
« Reply #31 on: May 26, 2010, 10:48:04 AM »

I don't know why we're surprised as deep down we all knew it would happen.

The only teams that should have qualified by right for the districts according to the rules are Hammy and possibly Scott Hamilton's old team minus Scott.

We have to remember that making these guys play in the pre-qualifiers would effect their overseas schedule and we wouldn't want to do that would we.

We could have brought the European playoffs back for a season as there's a lot of new teams, but obviously that's a bit radical for curling in Scotland.
Logged

When Hell freezes over, I'll curl there, too
James Hustler
Vice
***
Offline Offline

Curling Club: London CC (ECA)
Posts: 206


James H


« Reply #32 on: May 26, 2010, 12:15:28 PM »

We could have brought the European playoffs back for a season as there's a lot of new teams, but obviously that's a bit radical for curling in Scotland.

So why doesn't the previous Scottish champions just represent Scotland in the Europeans and have done with the playoffs entirely?  Grin Grin Grin

<ducks and runs for cover>
Logged
jjk
In Da House
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 557


« Reply #33 on: May 26, 2010, 02:31:12 PM »

James... i was on council when the european play-offs were introduced. There were several reasons. Quite often teams break up after the curling season and the previous champions no longer existed but the main reason was to get another top level competition for the top domestic teams to compete against each other and (hopefully) get the form team going forward. However the feeling towards the end of my sentence..sorry, time on council..was that competitions should be set up so only the top teams play them and one thing,as they say, has lead to another. There is no-one to blame for this except the players. It seems to me a boycott or "unofficial" scottish championship will not happen because no-one wants to rock the boat if there is a slight chance they will be asked to climb aboard someday.
Logged
Devils Advocate
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Curling Club: mystery
Posts: 355


« Reply #34 on: May 26, 2010, 04:15:20 PM »

We could have brought the European playoffs back for a season as there's a lot of new teams, but obviously that's a bit radical for curling in Scotland.

So why doesn't the previous Scottish champions just represent Scotland in the Europeans and have done with the playoffs entirely?  Grin Grin Grin

<ducks and runs for cover>
entirely sensible Mcwomble, entirely sensible.
I would go further and say that the Scottish winners will get fully supported for the following season - as long as it was the same team. If they all fell out then their support would get forfeited and the money and the honours of representing scotland at the euros would fall to the runners up.

Maybe it would force some continuity into the team.
Logged
Devils Advocate
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Curling Club: mystery
Posts: 355


« Reply #35 on: May 26, 2010, 04:21:53 PM »

Indeed , whatever happenned to open, fair competition???

face fits etc etc etc

Just because the primadonnas get themselves together doesnt make them any use as a team --- why should they then get a free berth to the next rounds?

As far as their overseas competitions etc - maybe they should remember that it is their results in the bread and butter competition at home that earns them the right to swan off abroad.

The scottish dates should be set out at the end of the prior season - known well in advance and if they cannot arrange their commitments to play at home then too bad. Lets see if they get the invites the following year when there is another scottish champ to go instead.
Logged
lonegunmen
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 307


« Reply #36 on: May 27, 2010, 07:35:49 AM »

What is happening in the Women's event, is Eve going to the Europeans as the champ and golden girl?  or is there a play off for that.

Does anyone know who is funded this season?  or will that depend what happens in the emergancy budget next month, I for 1 will be annoyed if my taxes go up, services cut but some teams still get big bags of money to swan off abroad when they want!
Logged
fermerfaefife
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2010, 06:56:26 PM »

Fraid the FFFF team wont be there this year again - cant be bothered with all the coming and going and very blatent bending of the rules to suit the "chosen" ones.

I for one thought that curling was a team game - and if what OTB says is correct and only Hammy & Scott are the only ones still eligible to go direct to the qualifiers then that is how it should be and everybosy else should have to qualify. Just because there is a few notable names in a new team doesnt mean they would qualify! The RCCC are the ones who introduced these damndable prequalifiers so they should have to live with the consequences.

Likewise, why should the rest of us have to put up with having the competition dates and format buggered around with just to suit the "professionals". If the rest of us cant manage due to work commitments etc - we just cant / wont play - thats life (and i dont see the RCCC rushing to help us!). The professionals would just have to choose what their priority is - going abroad or curling the scottish.

For me the solution is simple - scrap the pre-qualifiers and have an open and fair main qualifying round with the involvement of every team. You may get me to agree to seeding based on last year but thats it. (only Hammy & Scott would be seeded for instance this year) That would give the up and coming teams a chance to play the big teams for experience and put everyone on a level playing field.

PS - If you cant play in all the rounds then tough sh*t - you dont enter.
Logged
guddler
Vice
***
Offline Offline

Curling Club: Turra
Posts: 125


« Reply #38 on: May 27, 2010, 07:36:44 PM »

The only insight I can read into all these shinanigans is that the ultimate aim of the unelected  cabal within the RCCC who manage competitions (they are unanswerable to the membership for their decisions) is to make the national championships invitation only competitions. Masny past champions, of what used to be an amateur sport will be choking on their drams, or spinning in their graves.

RIP open competition, the foundation of true curling.   
Logged
mixeddoublesdemon
Lead
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #39 on: May 28, 2010, 10:53:58 AM »

I believe Neil Joss's team also skip the pre-qualifiers as they finished 8th last year so that would make 3 teams only.
Logged
fermerfaefife
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 260


« Reply #40 on: May 28, 2010, 02:59:52 PM »

So in other words we have 2 weekends of pre-qualifiers to get 17 teams to join the eligible 3 teams from last year in the main qualifiers to make up the 20 teams.

In effect they are back to square one where the pre-qualifiers ARE essentially the format of the main qualifiers in previous years. (as almost everybody has to play in them)

Scrap the prequalifiers and have everybody in the main competition over a couple of weekends. You might then get entries from the likes of us who unfortunately have to work for a living and have nagging wives at home and cant be away curling every weekend.

The old format wasn't perfect but it could have been run better to be fairer and avoid some of the problems. As for the clash of dates this year then the two rounds could be what is pencilled in for the 2nd round of the prequalifiers in Nov and the 1st round of the main event in Dec. Although to be fair the old pair of dates in January was ideal

Some root and branch reform and fresh and fair thinking is whats required.
Logged
The Phantom Nuisance
Vice
***
Offline Offline

Curling Club: Thornton
Posts: 230



« Reply #41 on: May 28, 2010, 05:50:31 PM »

What a load of BOLLCKS no team " PERIOD " should get to the districts or anywhere for that matter automatically. Every team should have to go through the same qualifying process as everyone else. If it means by some fluke some team of haddies end up in the finals then tough get over it. I'm sick of people thinking they are so much better and  " DESERVE " to be there , thats tripe , you only deserve to be there because you went through the  " FULL " qualification process.
Logged
12345
Skip
****
Online Online

Posts: 271


« Reply #42 on: May 28, 2010, 08:13:52 PM »

What a load of BOLLCKS no team " PERIOD " should get to the districts or anywhere for that matter automatically. Every team should have to go through the same qualifying process as everyone else. If it means by some fluke some team of haddies end up in the finals then tough get over it. I'm sick of people thinking they are so much better and  " DESERVE " to be there , thats tripe , you only deserve to be there because you went through the  " FULL " qualification process.

ok i agree that no team should get a bye, but i not many people think that they deserve to be there because they are so much better. i think it is more a case of that if you get a free ticket, you take it. if you dont, who cares, you play the pre qualifiers.
Logged
The Phantom Nuisance
Vice
***
Offline Offline

Curling Club: Thornton
Posts: 230



« Reply #43 on: June 02, 2010, 01:45:29 PM »

What a load of BOLLCKS no team " PERIOD " should get to the districts or anywhere for that matter automatically. Every team should have to go through the same qualifying process as everyone else. If it means by some fluke some team of haddies end up in the finals then tough get over it. I'm sick of people thinking they are so much better and  " DESERVE " to be there , thats tripe , you only deserve to be there because you went through the  " FULL " qualification process.

ok i agree that no team should get a bye, but i not many people think that they deserve to be there because they are so much better. i think it is more a case of that if you get a free ticket, you take it. if you dont, who cares, you play the pre qualifiers.
Sorry I didn't mean the players themselves thinking they were better than others I meant the fuds running the game and giving said teams their free ticket or is it a case of  " jobs for the boys " .
Logged
Devils Advocate
Skip
****
Offline Offline

Curling Club: mystery
Posts: 355


« Reply #44 on: July 21, 2010, 04:04:52 PM »

Entries closed at the end of June - Why no draw out yet?

Could it be that they have to fudge the format to suit the big names or is it that they are embarressed by a lack of response and are drumming up some more teams?

They should be able to have a draw out sooner than this - it invites conspiracy theories Huh
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Send this topicPrint  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
BlueSkies design by Bloc | XHTML | CSS
racehost web solutions | Lo-Fi version